MSCI World Value Index

The value index overweights MSCI World constituents by valuation metrics such as price-to-book and price-to-earnings. It is one of the classic factor indices.

The ten largest holdings make up 31.3% of the MSCI World Value, out of 392 holdings in total; the largest sector is Information Technology at 35.1% (as of Oct 11, 2026).

Composition – 50 Largest Holdings

Based on: Xtrackers MSCI World Value UCITS ETF 1c · as of Oct 11, 2026 · 392 holdings

Composition – 50 largest holdings
#StockTickerSectorCountryWeight
1Micron Technology Inc.MUInformation TechnologyUnited States16.12%
2Cisco Systems Inc.CSCOInformation TechnologyUnited States3.19%
3Verizon Communications Inc.VZCommunication ServicesUnited States2.04%
4Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.HPEInformation TechnologyUnited States1.80%
5AT&T IncTCommunication ServicesUnited States1.63%
6Toyota Motor Corp.7203Consumer DiscretionaryJapan1.61%
7QUALCOMM IncorporatedQCOMInformation TechnologyUnited States1.46%
8Shell PlcSHELLEnergyNetherlands1.19%
9Comcast Corporation Class ACMCSACommunication ServicesUnited States1.16%
10Pfizer Inc.PFEHealth CareUnited States1.13%
Show holdings 11 to 50

Sectors

Energy3.9%

Countries

United States49.0%
Japan20.3%
United Kingdom6.7%
France5.1%
Germany4.1%
Netherlands2.7%
Spain1.8%
Italy1.4%
Canada1.4%
Sweden0.9%
Finland0.9%
Australia0.9%

Data note 2

MSCI World Value Index Funds and ETFs

ETFs Tracking This Index

Data note 1

Portfolio With the MSCI World Value

This portfolio from our overview holds an ETF on the MSCI World Value. The calculation is based on the funds' daily net asset values and includes fund costs. The ETF overview compares all portfolios from a shared starting day.

Multi-Factor, Five Times 20

Small cap + value + momentum + quality + EM IMI

  • 20.0% MSCI World Small Cap (ZPRS)
  • 20.0% MSCI World Value (IS3S)
  • 20.0% MSCI World Momentum (XDEM)
  • 20.0% MSCI World Quality (IS3Q)
  • 20.0% MSCI EM IMI (IS3N)

Five equal building blocks, none of them the world index itself.

fromOct 3, 2014
Total227.5%
Per year10.38%
Deepest fall-34.6%
Cost (TER)0.23%

Rebalanced to target weights once a year. Letting it run would have produced 10.41% per year – 0.03 points more.

Data note 3